I was playing recently in a $5-$10 PLO game at the Horseshoe in Hammond Indiana and had an interesting river situation. We were deep-stacked and five-handed with lots of history between solid players.
PREFLOP: I had
Checking my option would have been fine, but you have to build a pot to win a pot; plus, I was stuck.
FLOP: We were four ways to a flop of
TURN: The turn was the
RIVER: The river brought the
My first reason for betting only $50 is I had a hand that could extract value from two pair, but I needed to bet small to get a light call.
Also, if I go to showdown, people see I’m value-betting light on the river and might pay me off more in the future. Advertising. But my main reason for betting small is I open the door for someone to make a play at the pot or try to make a value raise with a bad straight since my bet looks so weak.
The fish fell for my trap and raised to $250, which is just atrocious because he rarely, if ever has the nuts. He was the last person to act on the turn when the nut straight got there, plus I have two nines in my hand.
With that information in mind, I know he’s making a stone bluff or value-betting a bad straight. In case it was the latter, I raised to $600 to represent the missed check-raise on the turn. Everyone at the table had so much history with each other that I needed it to look believable, and a three-bet on the river in a four-way pot looks pretty damn strong.
You could argue a check-raise on the river would have sufficed, but cash-game poker is an art, not a science.